Google has responded to an open letter, written by News Corp for the European Commission, which criticises the company and claims its search engine is negatively impacting news organisations.
In the original letter, News Corp chief executive Robert Thomson said Google was changing the way links are ranked and shown in its search results, which would “inevitably maximise income for Google” and “punish” small companies. Thomson argued this, alongside its handling of Android, was evidence Google now “exploit(s) its dominant market position to stifle competition.”
Today, Google responded with a ‘Dear Rupert’ blog post:
“With the Internet, people enjoy greater choice than ever before — and because the competition is just one click away online, barriers to switching are very, very low. Google is of course very popular in Europe, but we are not the gatekeeper to the web.”
The company also highlighted the different ways readers are now able to find sites and information online: going directly to sites, using publication-specific apps and using specialist search services such as Expedia and TripAdvisor.
In regards to how Google tinkers with its search ranking:
“Of course we regularly change our algorithms — we make over 500 changes a year. But these changes are all about improving the user experience, not punishing small companies. Indeed, it’s well documented that the highest-profile change to our search ranking, called ‘Panda’, actually reduced our advertising revenue.”
News Corp’s open letter was directed at the Commission as part of a long-running antitrust dispute. Google clinched a deal in February, meaning it would display results from competing services more prominently in search, but earlier this month the Commission reopened talks to try to obtain fresh concessions.
Top image credit: Adam Berry/Getty Images
Google appears to have finally hit the button to integrate Google Voice into Hangouts messaging service.
Android Police first noted that users are being given the option to migrate their Google Voice accounts in order to receive calls and text messages via the Hangouts mobile app. The blog notes that the services are integrated on desktops too
The consolidation makes absolute sense, and has been speculated for some time. The move puts Android on a par with Apple’s iPhones, which offer internet-based calls and text messages via its iMessage and FaceTimes services and are integrated into the core messaging and call apps within iOS.
Android Police says there are some hiccups — replies do not appear to be sending, from their experience — but it seems likely that any initial issues will be smoothed out in due course.
We’ve reached out to Google for comment, and will update this article with any further details that we are given.
Google Street View now transports you into Ancient Egypt
Google is pushing product ads to third-party e-commerce sites for more ‘contextually relevant results’
Few jobs require more boring drudgery than what accountants have to deal with on a daily basis when performing an audit — they literally spend their time making sure that numbers in one column reflect what numbers in a bunch of other columns should add up to.
Beyond the nature of the work, the actual process for verifying all those numbers isn’t pretty. According to AuditFile CEO Steven Bong, most CPAs he’s encountered built their workflow on top of the Microsoft Office suite, keeping track of accounts in massive spreadsheets and audit progress in Word documents.
A typical audit will have hundreds of steps of verification, and some don’t have to be done depending on the results of other steps. But because they’d have to go back and search through Word documents to see those results, huge swaths of time are wasted just figuring out what to work on next. Bong saw this inefficiency as an opportunity, and in 2011 set out to create a service that would put the entire process in a simple web app.
After two years of development, AuditFile landed its first paying client in 2013 — a 15-person accounting firm based in San Francisco. Once it was able to prove that it could significantly increase productivity, Bong says the company began to hunt down bigger game. Today, AuditFile’s clients employ 300 accountants on average, and the majority of accountants at each firm use their software.
To expand, the company is increasing the size of its sales force and building out its app so that it can be used for internal corporate audits, in the hopes that it can become a killer app for finance teams at Fortune 500 companies.
Neither of those plans are cheap, which is why the company recently raised $3 million in a round led by Banneker Ventures that also included investments from Tim Draper, the rapper Nas, Rothenberg Ventures, and Ray Tonsing.
As part of its new sales efforts, the company is rolling out a nationwide ad campaign that includes some old-school strategies for getting attention. Cold-calling, a direct mail campaign, and print ads in the Journal of Accountancy are all part of the plan, which sounds outdated in 2014 — until you remember that this is the same group that managed one of its most important tasks by manually logging progress in Word documents.
IMAGE BY AuditFile (IMAGE HAS BEEN MODIFIED)
Read more here: AuditFile Raises $3M To Offer Task Management For Accountants
BACtrack has been making breathalyzers for years, but it didn’t release its first smartphone unit until last year. The new Vio is more compact and affordable than the original BACtrack Mobile.
Alongside the product launch, BACtrack has also released an improved app with a better-looking design and new features like the ability to guess your blood alcohol content ahead of time.
The Vio is a bit thicker than a large USB stick, but it’s not too big for your pocket. The device is powered by a AAA battery, which I prefer over the rechargeable micro-USB batteries that some units have. To test your levels, open up the app on your phone, hold down the button to pair the Vio and then wait for the device to warm up.
Keep in mind that you should wait 15-20 minutes after eating and drinking to test in order to ensure accurate results. Once your reading is in, the app will suggest how much time you have before you’re sober again. You can also save your results over time if you’d like to keep a history of your consumption and how it affects you.
As I wrote last year, I’m a big supporter of the move to use our smartphones to make breathalyzers readily available to consumers. Most drinkers have to just guess what their limits are. The extra data could save lives.
Smartphone breathalyzers aren’t going to single-handedly do away with drunk driving, alcohol poisoning and other related problems, but if they make even a small dent, they will have proven themselves as powerful technology. Considering how convenient and affordable BACtrack’s Vio is, there aren’t many obstacles to keeping one on hand. If you’re a regular drinker, I recommend that you pick up the Vio, or a competing product like the Breathometer or the Alcohoot.
Go here to read the rest: BACtrack releases a $50 smartphone breathalyzer that fits on your keychain
Google has tweaked its Google Maps app for iOS with a few new updates today which are primarily designed to make it easier to navigate search results and discover places around you.
The updated app now shows search results with descriptions directly on the map and offers the option of switching between grid and map view in a bid to help you find the place you’re looking for more quickly. Google has also tweaked the ‘Explore’ feature - a local guide that suggests places and activities based on your location and the time – for better results.
Rounding off the list of notable changes is an option to display all of your reservations and events from Gmail labelled directly on the map.
➤ Google Maps [App Store]
Featured Image Credit – Twin Design / Shutterstock
Dropbox updates desktop client with streaming sync: Up to 2x faster
Digg revives News.me as Digg Deeper, revealing the best links your friends are sharing on Twitter
This morning the public markets welcomed MobileIron to the NASDAQ, sending its shares up 17.67 percent at the time of writing. MobileIron is a mobile-IT provider for large corporations.
MobileIron’s IPO was viewed by some as a proxy for the larger technology markets, given its quickly expanding revenue in its most recent full-calendar year, as well as its deepening losses. Like a number of other technology companies looking to go public, MobileIron is growing its recurring revenue at the expense of short-term losses in the form of sales costs.
In its updated S-1 filing, MobileIron detailed its first-quarter 2014 results, in contrast to its first-quarter 2013 results. Revenue grew, modestly, from $25.82 million to $28.21 million, but “Subscription” revenue jumped from $2.73 million to $5.96 million.
Investors could be focusing more on that figure than the firm’s net loss for the three-month period that widened from $3.14 million in the first quarter of 2013, to $13.96 million in the same quarter in 2014.
During that interval, sales and marketing costs expanded from $13.76 million to $21.76 million. The company’s last reported pre-IPO cash tally totaled $64.44 million.
MobileIron picked up around $100 million today, going public at $9 per share. It is currently trading around the $10.60 mark. The company priced mid-point in its proposed range.
Given that the market appears to have welcomed MobileIron, other companies with expanding losses and expanding revenue could now find the time ripe to hit go. Good Technology and Box are obvious candidates.
Update: I spoke with the CEO of MobileIron, Bob Tinker about his company’s debut. He expressed contentment with the early, strong market reception to the IPO. Asked to describe the current IPO market temperature, Tinker called the market “discerning,” saying that investors were taking the time to understand new offerings. The company declined to discuss forward-looking profit forecasts, citing a quiet period.
The company’s shares are now up a more modest 12%, following a dip.
Read the original here: MobileIron Pops 17% In Public Debut
The Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) has ruled today that individuals should have the right to remove outdated information about themselves returned in results delivered by search companies such as Google.
The so-called ‘right to be forgotten’, proposed by the European Union in 2012, means that an individual should be allowed to request that outdated or irrelevant information is removed from a company’s servers and therefore removed from being publicly accessible on the Web. It was a view with which the ECJ agreed:
The Court observes in this regard that even initially lawful processing of accurate data may, in the course of time, become incompatible with the directive where, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, the data appear to be inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive in relation to the purposes for which they were processed and in the light of the time that has elapsed.
The Court adds that, when appraising such a request made by the data subject in order to oppose the processing carried out by the operator of a search engine, it should in particular be examined whether the data subject has a right that the information in question relating to him personally should, at this point in time, no longer be linked to his name by a list of results that is displayed following a search made on the basis of his name. If that is the case, the links to web pages containing that information must be removed from that list of results, unless there are particular reasons, such as the role played by the data subject in public life, justifying a preponderant interest of the public in having access to the information when such a search is made.
The case was brought about by a Spanish man, Mario Costeja Gonzalez, whose name returned 16-year-old news articles results about his sale of properties when he got into financial difficulties, which he wanted removed. After going to a Spanish tribunal seeking to get the results removed, the ECJ was asked to step in and clarify exactly how European laws should be interpreted.
We’ve asked Google for its take on the decision and will update when we hear back.
➤ An internet search engine operator is responsible for the processing that it carries out of personal data which appear on web pages published by third parties [Court of Justice of the European Union - PDF]
Featured Image Credit – Alex Klein/AFP/Getty Images
Continue reading here: Search engines can be forced to remove links relating to individuals, European court rules