BACtrack has been making breathalyzers for years, but it didn’t release its first smartphone unit until last year. The new Vio is more compact and affordable than the original BACtrack Mobile.
Alongside the product launch, BACtrack has also released an improved app with a better-looking design and new features like the ability to guess your blood alcohol content ahead of time.
The Vio is a bit thicker than a large USB stick, but it’s not too big for your pocket. The device is powered by a AAA battery, which I prefer over the rechargeable micro-USB batteries that some units have. To test your levels, open up the app on your phone, hold down the button to pair the Vio and then wait for the device to warm up.
Keep in mind that you should wait 15-20 minutes after eating and drinking to test in order to ensure accurate results. Once your reading is in, the app will suggest how much time you have before you’re sober again. You can also save your results over time if you’d like to keep a history of your consumption and how it affects you.
As I wrote last year, I’m a big supporter of the move to use our smartphones to make breathalyzers readily available to consumers. Most drinkers have to just guess what their limits are. The extra data could save lives.
Smartphone breathalyzers aren’t going to single-handedly do away with drunk driving, alcohol poisoning and other related problems, but if they make even a small dent, they will have proven themselves as powerful technology. Considering how convenient and affordable BACtrack’s Vio is, there aren’t many obstacles to keeping one on hand. If you’re a regular drinker, I recommend that you pick up the Vio, or a competing product like the Breathometer or the Alcohoot.
Go here to read the rest: BACtrack releases a $50 smartphone breathalyzer that fits on your keychain
Google has tweaked its Google Maps app for iOS with a few new updates today which are primarily designed to make it easier to navigate search results and discover places around you.
The updated app now shows search results with descriptions directly on the map and offers the option of switching between grid and map view in a bid to help you find the place you’re looking for more quickly. Google has also tweaked the ‘Explore’ feature - a local guide that suggests places and activities based on your location and the time – for better results.
Rounding off the list of notable changes is an option to display all of your reservations and events from Gmail labelled directly on the map.
➤ Google Maps [App Store]
Featured Image Credit – Twin Design / Shutterstock
Dropbox updates desktop client with streaming sync: Up to 2x faster
Digg revives News.me as Digg Deeper, revealing the best links your friends are sharing on Twitter
This morning the public markets welcomed MobileIron to the NASDAQ, sending its shares up 17.67 percent at the time of writing. MobileIron is a mobile-IT provider for large corporations.
MobileIron’s IPO was viewed by some as a proxy for the larger technology markets, given its quickly expanding revenue in its most recent full-calendar year, as well as its deepening losses. Like a number of other technology companies looking to go public, MobileIron is growing its recurring revenue at the expense of short-term losses in the form of sales costs.
In its updated S-1 filing, MobileIron detailed its first-quarter 2014 results, in contrast to its first-quarter 2013 results. Revenue grew, modestly, from $25.82 million to $28.21 million, but “Subscription” revenue jumped from $2.73 million to $5.96 million.
Investors could be focusing more on that figure than the firm’s net loss for the three-month period that widened from $3.14 million in the first quarter of 2013, to $13.96 million in the same quarter in 2014.
During that interval, sales and marketing costs expanded from $13.76 million to $21.76 million. The company’s last reported pre-IPO cash tally totaled $64.44 million.
MobileIron picked up around $100 million today, going public at $9 per share. It is currently trading around the $10.60 mark. The company priced mid-point in its proposed range.
Given that the market appears to have welcomed MobileIron, other companies with expanding losses and expanding revenue could now find the time ripe to hit go. Good Technology and Box are obvious candidates.
Update: I spoke with the CEO of MobileIron, Bob Tinker about his company’s debut. He expressed contentment with the early, strong market reception to the IPO. Asked to describe the current IPO market temperature, Tinker called the market “discerning,” saying that investors were taking the time to understand new offerings. The company declined to discuss forward-looking profit forecasts, citing a quiet period.
The company’s shares are now up a more modest 12%, following a dip.
Read the original here: MobileIron Pops 17% In Public Debut
The Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) has ruled today that individuals should have the right to remove outdated information about themselves returned in results delivered by search companies such as Google.
The so-called ‘right to be forgotten’, proposed by the European Union in 2012, means that an individual should be allowed to request that outdated or irrelevant information is removed from a company’s servers and therefore removed from being publicly accessible on the Web. It was a view with which the ECJ agreed:
The Court observes in this regard that even initially lawful processing of accurate data may, in the course of time, become incompatible with the directive where, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, the data appear to be inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive in relation to the purposes for which they were processed and in the light of the time that has elapsed.
The Court adds that, when appraising such a request made by the data subject in order to oppose the processing carried out by the operator of a search engine, it should in particular be examined whether the data subject has a right that the information in question relating to him personally should, at this point in time, no longer be linked to his name by a list of results that is displayed following a search made on the basis of his name. If that is the case, the links to web pages containing that information must be removed from that list of results, unless there are particular reasons, such as the role played by the data subject in public life, justifying a preponderant interest of the public in having access to the information when such a search is made.
The case was brought about by a Spanish man, Mario Costeja Gonzalez, whose name returned 16-year-old news articles results about his sale of properties when he got into financial difficulties, which he wanted removed. After going to a Spanish tribunal seeking to get the results removed, the ECJ was asked to step in and clarify exactly how European laws should be interpreted.
We’ve asked Google for its take on the decision and will update when we hear back.
➤ An internet search engine operator is responsible for the processing that it carries out of personal data which appear on web pages published by third parties [Court of Justice of the European Union - PDF]
Featured Image Credit – Alex Klein/AFP/Getty Images
Continue reading here: Search engines can be forced to remove links relating to individuals, European court rules
Apple’s earnings are out, and the iPhone’s 17 percent growth was likely the most noteworthy number in its hardware results. That’s a big increase for a device that analysts expected to perform pretty much on par in terms of Q2 last year. One probable reason: growth in Greater China, where Apple saw 5 percent increase in revenue sequentially between Q1 and Q2, versus a pretty consistent 20 to 30 percent dip across the board in all other regions, which is the usual course for post-holiday results.
That the iPhone’s growth is probably tied to China comes down to one major factor, and a few smaller ones; Apple launched the iPhone with China Mobile during the quarter, adding a massive new potential subscriber base to its existing customer pool in the area. Analysts had reported that they saw “several million” pre-orders for iPhone on China Mobile ahead of launch, and Piper Jaffray’s Gene Munster predicted sales of 3 million devices on the new network through March. On the earnings call today, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that the company saw all-time record sales of iPhone in the BRIC countries, and that revenue of near $10 billion in Greater China also represents a new all-time record.
On the call, Cook also noted that in China, 62 percent of iPhone 4S buyers came from Android, as well as 60 percent of iPhone 5c buyers, indicating those lower cost options are doing what Apple needs them to do.
Microsoft today announced that it has sold over 5 million Xbox One consoles to retailers around the globe, but sales of the system have still lagged behind rival Sony’s PlayStation 4. By comparison, Sony revealed on Wednesday that PS4 sales had topped 7 million in sales to consumers.
March US sales estimates from NPD put the PS4 in first place for hardware sales for the third month in a row. Both Microsoft and Sony (inFamous Second Son, Titanfall) saw major exclusives released on their platforms last month. Titanfall’s combined Xbox One and PC release took the top spot in game sales, according to NPD, with inFamous Second Son in second.
While we expected to see a bump in sales of Xbox One units due to the Titanfall bundle, Microsoft is continuing to fall behind. It’s still early for this generation’s console war, but the Xbox One will need a few more hit titles to catch up.
Microsoft’s new Xbox head recently admitted that the company had made mistakes with the launch and renewed his commitment to putting “gaming first” on the console.
Image Credit: GLENN CHAPMAN/AFP/Getty Images
Uber adds $1 “Safe Rides Fee” to UberX rides to pay for background checks and insurance
Google’s Project Tango teams up with NASA for autonomous space robots
Zomato has launched its fully overhauled Web and mobile apps today in a bid to increase user activity and engagement though more social interaction across the platform.
Where it was once a simple restaurant finder app, the new version brings a wholly refreshed social element into the equation. One of the key updates is FoodFeed, a scrolling list that shows updates from users you follow, as well as restaurant reviews, ratings and more. You can now also filter search results to only display recommendations from people you follow, who are, presumably, people you trust.
With the new social graces come a significant change to the way in which the app works: it’s now mandatory to log-in if you want to use it. In the past, you had the option of logging in using your Facebook or Google account, or creating a new one on Zomato using an email address, but there was also the option to skip it altogether. This is no longer possible. Reviews and restaurants can still be shared outside the app across your normal social networks, but the company has made it easier to invite friends too, clearly aiming at increasing its overall user base.
The success – and weakness – of any platform such as Zomato comes in the trustworthiness of the restaurant reviews and the results it serves up to users. To this end, there’s now has an enhanced anti-spam system to weed out any “evidently manufactured” reviews, and restaurant ratings have been normalised to prevent bias and avoid clustering too many within a certain score range.
On top of adding new features and rethinking its restaurant ratings, there’s an all round revamp of the app to check out. For example, Zomato says it now takes fewer clicks to discover new restaurants and that Londoners can search for recommendation by postcode, tube station or near specific landmarks.
The update is available from today across Zomato’s Web, iOS and Android apps.
Featured Image Credit – ANA AREVALO/AFP/Getty Images
Rocket Internet aims to clean up Germany’s domestic cleaning industry with Helpling
Chrome 34 launches with support for responsive images, unprefixed Web Audio, and importing supervised users
Omada Health, a San Francisco startup that makes digital health therapy programs for people with type 2 diabetes and other serious but potentially treatable issues, has raised $23 million in new funding.
The new investment, which is Omada’s Series B, was led by Andreessen Horowitz, with Andreessen Horowitz partner Balaji Srinivasan joining the startup’s board of directors. Also participating in the round were Kaiser Permanente Ventures and previous investors U.S. Venture Partners and The Vertical Group. This brings the total investment in Omada to $28.5 million.
In an interview this week, Omada co-founder and CEO Sean Duffy told me that his company aims to bridge the gap between proven traditional offline support groups and therapies, and modern digital technology. He said:
“The behavioral science world has figured out how to help people with issues like diabetes, smoking cessation, insomnia, and the like. But it’s mostly been in face-to-face treatments, with group meetings at places like community centers and YMCAs.
We’ve looked at the elements and turned these things into digital programs, and made programmatic experiences that we validate clinically with reproducible results.”
Clinical results mean that Omada’s programs are things that insurance providers are actually willing to pay for. Omada’s flagship treatment, called Prevent, is a 16-week web-based program aimed at addressing prediabetes in adults. Because Omada has been able to provide clinical proof that its programs work just as effectively as traditional in-person therapies, they are covered by healthcare providers including Blue Shield Louisiana, Kaiser Permanente, and Stanford Hospital.
The financial reimbursement is what truly sets Omada apart from other consumer-oriented players in the health space. “In the world of digital health 1.0, people have made great products that people want to use and share with friends, but they haven’t fit with enterprise level health programs,” Duffy says. “Omada has developed consumer grade digital health products, and we also know how to get health systems to pay for them.”
In a separate interview, Andreessen Horowitz partner Balaji Srinivasan told me that it’s that mix of consumer approachability with clinical results that compelled his firm to invest in the company. “Omada is first thing I’ve seen which is a clinically proven way to make a medical intervention over an Internet connection. They’ve developed clinically valid, reproducible, scalable treatments that are delivered in whole or in part over the Internet,” he said. “It’s this very clever combination of things.”
As far as the competitive landscape goes, Duffy says that Omada has raised this money now to take advantage of its position at the nexus between consumer-first apps and enterprise health products. “We’ve seen companies like Fitbit and Weight Watchers increasingly eyeing the enterprise healthcare space. And big health plans like United Healthcare are creating potential competitors too,” he said. “We bridge between these two worlds, and we want to continue to grow in a way that others can’t yet.”
Omada currently has 30 full time staff, and expects to double its headcount by the end of the year.
Frankly, the only way this ad could be more effective is if it was a “let me google that for you” link. HTC is right here. Dead right.
In the first video ad for the new HTC One, Gary Oldman advises viewers to turn to the Internet to learn about the new phone. It simply doesn’t matter what Gary or Robert Downey Jr. tells viewers about the phone. It’s all marketing speak. Worthless. But great SEO is priceless.
HTC’s new flagship phone is the predecessor to the universally adored HTC One. It’s hard to find a bad review of the original One, which is seemingly the case of the new One as well. Google it as HTC suggests and the results will be filled with articles praising the phone. Everything else is “blah”.
HTC, quietly clever.
Read more here: HTC Goes “Blah Blah Blah” In The First HTC One M8 Ad
Chinese Web monitoring service GreatFire is once again raising objections to the way Microsoft’s Bing operates in China — this time round claiming that it censors heavily within the country, even more so than domestic search engine Baidu.
Last month, Bing came under fire for censoring China-related information not only within the country’s boundaries but worldwide. Subsequently, Microsoft said changes to China-related Bing searches done globally were an error, not censorship. Bing responded to the allegations by saying that the only time it adjusts search results is to “comply with local law or for quality or safety reasons such as child abuse or malware.” It insisted that Bing search results outside of China would not be modified in any way to accommodate Chinese law.
GreatFire’s latest allegations, however, zoom in on Bing’s domestic censorship. The organization cites an independent comprehensive audit that examined Bing’s search engine results page for over 30,000 sensitive and non-sensitive query terms, and launched these queries from both inside and outside of China. It says that “comparing and examining these results, plus querying with special search operators, reveals unprecedented detail on Bing’s China filtering practices.”
In particular, it says the Chinese version of Bing has a list of 139 forbidden terms which it doesn’t display any results for, a blacklist of 329 websites that it never shows to China users, as well as a “huge” blacklist of URLs exceeding more than 1,500.
GreatFire notes that Bing blocked all results from five foreign language editions of Wikipedia: Japanese, French, German, Dutch and Swedish. However, the organization says these bans have been lifted after it approached Microsoft about the issue.
In particular, GreatFire compares Bing’s censorship to domestic Internet giant Baidu, with the example of the site heweifang2009.blog.163.com owned by Professor He Weifang, a prominent pro-democracy legal scholar at Peking University. GreatFire notes: “His blog is not censored by the domestic blogging site blog.163.com, which is operated by NetEase, a major Chinese internet company. This website is not censored by Baidu either, but is being censored entirely by Bing in China.”
GreatFire is demanding that Microsoft explain why Bing censors so much content, “including domestic content that is not even censored by China-based web properties like Baidu.” It is urging Microsoft to follow the action taken with regards to the five Wikipedia sites by removing other “inappropriate” filtering rules on Bing for Chinese users, and to disclose the internal processes and approval mechanisms in place every time Microsoft gets a request to censor domestic content.
We have reached out to Microsoft and will update with any response provided.
Headline image via Ethan Miller/Getty Images