Mophie has a new Juice Pack out, designed for the Galaxy S5. The case packs a huge 3,000 mAh battery within its glossy shell, which is slightly larger than the 2,850 mAh unit within the Galaxy S5 itself. True, you could carry around a spare battery for the GS5 and pop the back whenever you want more power, but the Mophie’s extra juice is just a switch away, and it includes passthrough charging, which is a lot simpler than changing out internal components.
The Mophie comes in a variety of colors, but the review unit I was sent is a glossy white. It’s like the Mophie battery packs you’ve come to know and love, with a curved back ensconcing the ‘baby bump’ of the spare powerhouse. Of note, however, is that this will significantly increase the pocket presence of your GS5, since at its thickest point it more than doubles the depth of the device.
It also adds length to the top and bottom of the 4.7-inch smartphone, giving it a physical footprint more akin to that of the new iPhone 6 Plus, but with a much chunkier profile. As you might expect, it also adds weight. But the trade-offs have immediately apparent value: You’ll likely get a full charge from empty from the battery pack, plus or minus a little bit depending. Given Samsung’s already impressive battery life on the GS5, you’ll find that can mean up to three or more full days of battery on a single charge of both the case and phone, which is game-changing when you’re using it on excursions.
I’m reluctant to carry around the behemoth that the GS5 plus the Mophie becomes when combined Voltron-style too often, but for special cases like conferences it would be a veritable life-saver. Mophie’s typical commitment to quality shows here, too, with a battery that should last you more cycles than lower cost options from Amazon.
Mophie’s accessory will run you $99.95, so it’s worth considering whether you need this kind of gear in your life before laying down some cash, but if you find yourself seeing that red battery icon more often than you’d like, it’s still likely your best, most convenient choice for spare top-ups.
View original post here: Mophie’s Samsung Galaxy S5 Juice Pack Gives You Ample Smartphone Life
Bitcoin advocates often emphasize that the cryptocurrency’s greatest impact will be on the “other 6.5 billion” people who have otherwise been excluded from modern financial tools and services. But far from being the magic bullet that Bitcoin appears to be on paper, bringing it to the mainstream in the developing world involves a multi-disciplinary initiative capable of surmounting some significant challenges.
Just last month, the Philippines gave birth to its 100 millionth citizen, a baby girl named Chonalyn. The headcount was largely symbolic; in truth, about a hundred other babies were being born at the same time around the country. It was however no accident that the press conference announcing the birth was held at Jose Fabella Hospital in Manila, a state-run center known for crowding mothers and their newborns five to a bed.
The population is growing by three babies per minute, and with the low-income brackets accounting for over 90 percent of our citizenry, it’s not altogether surprising that so many of us have to leave in order to find a reasonable wage. Indeed, the Philippines is the eighth largest source of immigrants in the world, and the third largest in terms of sending remittances back home. The flow of funds from the fifty or so nations where the Filipino diaspora has presence comes to about 10 percent of our country’s GDP.
You couldn’t write a more appropriate problem case for Bitcoin.
With the average remittance cost from the US to the Philippines at 5.3 percent, Bitcoin is seemingly poised to crush the competition. That this isn’t already the case might be surprising to some (Bitcoin remitters in the Philippines have lowered that cost to just 1%), but the situation is actually far more complex than it appears on the surface.
With over 10 million Filipinos currently living outside the Philippines, spreading awareness about a Bitcoin-based alternative is no small task. The diaspora is scattered across many different regions, professions, and contexts, thus making a single broad educational campaign untenable.
Any promotions espousing the benefits of Bitcoin-powered remittance (more succinctly, “rebittance”) need to leverage the face-to-face nature of our various communities. Filipino migrant workers regularly congregate in parks, malls (Lucky Plaza in Singapore, World-Wide House in Hong Kong, as primary cases in point), and city squares around the world on the weekends, which will force most efforts to go offline with their delivery.
These environments were once described to me as “Sunday moshpits,” with a breathtaking number of people crammed into a single commercial venue for a single day to trade and socialise.
Within these “moshpits” operate a variety of small hyper-local remittance kiosks that cater exclusively to these city-specific hot spots. Most of them charge flat fees (anecdotally, US$5-6 for transactions of under $3,000) coupled with a small profit margin on the exchange rate (between 1 and 1.5 percent).
When measured against these smaller competitors, the 1 percent transaction fee that crypto-powered remittance providers offer may not be perceived as a significant advantage. This is especially the case when one considers the inconvenience of actually exchanging your local currency for BTC in the first place.
In the US and some EU countries, customers may be able to fund their Bitcoin wallets via a Coinbase-connected bank account, but in other areas the answer is not as straightforward. And if you can’t get BTC, then you can’t use it to make remittances.
The rise of Bitcoin ATMs (informally, BTMs) is a critical piece to this puzzle, as they provide a practical means of exchange that also happens to be highly visible to the general public. They represent hard focal points for Bitcoin interest in cities where the cryptocurrency is still largely an abstract concept for most people.
In truth, the single most important move that rebittance providers could make is to create partnerships with all the BTM installations around the world, ensuring that both the primary method for BTC acquisition, and the primary use case for Bitcoin are sitting right next to each other in the proverbial strip mall kiosk.
Once the BTC has been acquired by a customer, they fill out a recipient information form, aim it at the rebittance provider’s QR code, and bits come flying out of their wallet. The active part of the process (filling out the form and interacting with your wallet app) is a straightforward, 1-2 minute process. The passive part, waiting for that first blockchain confirmation, may take up to 10 minutes, but once it’s done, the sender needs only to sit back and wait for additional alerts via email.
Therein lies the magic of Bitcoin remittance. The transfer of funds has occurred through a publicly-shared resource — the blockchain network — and thus incurs none of the arbitrary costs associated with centralised systems such as Western Union, or Xoom, or good old ACH. Indeed, the direct cost of Bitcoin transfers is so small (about 4 US cents) that most businesses will simply absorb it.
Once the rebittance provider has confirmed the BTC transfer, the problem morphs into one of logistics. BTC has indeed made its way from the customer’s wallet to the provider’s, but the final recipient of the money transfer is expecting Philippine Peso.
To fulfil this, the provider exchanges the Bitcoin again, but this time for PHP, and then delivers it to the specified recipient. Sometimes this is as straightforward as making a deposit at a local bank, sometimes it involves working with local pawnshop cum payout centers, and still other times, it means engaging a delivery partner to take the funds directly to someone’s doorstep.
The Filipino population is projected to double within the next 42 years — in about the same time it’ll take to spawn two new generations — and the strategies for providing education and healthcare for the next 100 million people are best described as a series of increasingly urgent question marks. Education currently accounts for about 12 percent of the country’s entire national budget for 2014 (US$6 billion out of US$50 billion), a ratio that seems reasonable until you look at the absolute figures.
With about half of our population currently between the ages of 5 and 20, this implies a public education budget allocation of just US$15 per youngster per school month. (Comparatively, the United States set aside US$68 billion for its own youth population in the same year.)
Rebittance doesn’t address this issue directly, but rather seeks to optimise the private sector’s money transfer activities with the aim of freeing up more funds for other expenses — education and healthcare being at the forefront.
With the average Filipino remittance amount at US$250 per month, it’s likely that our collective activities in the Bitcoin industry will result in a savings of US$5 to US$8 per rebittance (or US$60 to US$100 per year). It isn’t a huge amount, but it is enough to cover the peripheral costs of public school attendance such as transportation and materials.
Whether or not the average low-income Filipino parent will make the “correct” decision and spend those savings in the right place is, ironically, a question of proper education, but the first step on this long road is to make those savings possible. Bitcoin’s core promise has always been that of financial freedom, and once we’ve checked off that rather significant box, we can move on to the really world-changing stuff.
Stella, the first ever family sized road vehicle that runs on the sun has made its U.S. debut. The car took first place in the World Solar Challenge and won the Michelin Cruiser Class for completing a 3,000 kilometer journey from Darwin to Adelaide in Australia last fall.
While other solar-powered vehicles have been made for racing, the solar-powered Stella is the first vehicle made for road travel. A large solar panel sits atop the roof to power the car up to 500 miles on a single charge. Compare that to a Tesla Roadster, which can run on an electric charge for 245-300 miles.
The Netherlands team that designed the vehicle took Stella for a U.S. tour to help kick off National Drive Electric Week. They recently traveled up Highway 1 from L.A. to San Francisco, and I met up with them in SF to check out Stella.
Follow this link: The First Four-Seater, Solar-Powered Vehicle Hits The U.S. Road
Uber has until the end of October to change its payment process in India or risk being banned from operating there. That’s because the country’s reserve bank (the RBI) has issued new guidelines that require two-step verification system for certain card payments.
A directive relating to Card Not Present (CNP) transactions issued on Friday requires companies which automatically charge customers for goods — such as Uber and other taxi-booking services — to introduce a second, verification step that authenticates a payment before it is made. Uber currently requires all users to provide a credit card to use its service, which it uses to automatically bill in a single step after each ride is completed.
RBI has given companies until the end of October to make changes. Uber has previously said it will be flexible on payment methods in Asia – Mike Brown, its regional general manager in Southeast Asia, told us it could embrace cash payments and other new strategies – so it seems likely that it will do as required in order to comply.
India became Uber’s second largest market in terms of cities served last week, when it expanded into four new locations in a single day. The company has plenty of competition from local rivals though. Olacabs recently raised a $40 million funding round, while Meru Cabs (rumored $50 million) and Taxiforsure ($30 million) have also taken on cash from investors lately and have plans to expand.
We contacted Uber for comment, but did not receive a reply at the time of writing. We will update this post with any information that we receive from the company.
Update: Uber declined to comment on the news.
Image via Shutterstock
Mozilla is launching its first Firefox OS smartphone in India this week
Bubbly, Asia’s ‘Twitter for Voice,’ is not closing; instead sold to Indian mobile services firm
See the article here: Uber has until the end of October to introduce two-step payments in India, or face a ban
In the ongoing war between Uber, Lyft, and all of the other me-too ride-sharing services, competitors are looking for any way they can better utilize their supply of drivers and reduce costs for their riders. Today, Uber is announcing UberPool, a new feature that will let you pick up other riders on the way to your destination and split the bill.
While the feature should do a lot to cut costs for passengers, not everyone will want to ride with a stranger in addition to the driver picking them up; Uber notes that the new feature also serves as a kind of “social experiment.”
Since there’s not much data about how people will react to the new service, Uber isn’t going to release UberPool across every market it serves. The company has begun rolling out a private beta, and starting August 15 a public beta will launch in the San Francisco Bay Area. Uber also notes that the company’s “friends at Google” will be joining the beta as early adopters, as they “share [Uber's] vision of a more energy-efficient world with less traffic congestion and pollution in our cities and are excited to be early adopters of UberPool.” This signals continued cooperation between the companies following Google integrating Uber into Google Maps for iOS and Android.
Getting more riders into a single car to make rides cheaper isn’t exactly a novel idea. In June we covered Hitch, a ride-sharing service whose biggest differentiator from Uber and Lyft was the fact that it tries to use software to maximize the number of passengers in a single car to increase driver utilization and reduce prices for riders.
Go here to read the rest: UberPool Lets You Split Uber Fares With Other Passengers Along The Same Route
One fun Google trick is the ability to type in “5 Euro in USD” and get an acceptably accurate currency conversion in a few seconds. Now, however, you can get your BTC on by simply typing “price of bitcoin” or “X bitcoin to euro.” The feature rolled out yesterday as a reaction to Bing’s addition of BTC pricing in that search engine.
It’s one small step for Google, one giant leap for the obsessives who track every single apparent change in Bitcoin adoption.
Continued here: Google Adds Bitcoin Price Conversions
The funding round is lead by Andreessen Horowitz with help from Data Collective and Fuel Capital. This follows seed funding a year ago of $2.25M from Andreessen Horowitz, Kleiner Perkins, Foundation Capital and SV Angel.
The company wants to change how companies manage resources on servers inside the datacenter, based on the open source Mesos project by essentially allowing you to pool the all of the computing resources in a datacenter as a single machine, thereby distributing resources in a much more efficient manner (as the graphic above illustrates).
According to Matt Trifiro, SVP at Mesosphere, this is possible because of containerization technology developed by Google. Building on Google’s concept, Mesos allows system administrators to take complex applications that run at scale and use the resources of the entire datacenter as a single unit inside a container.
As Trifiro explained, this is markedly different from virtual machines, which break a single machine into multiple smaller machines. This has allowed system administrators to run applications in a much more organized manner by using the entire machine. He said that approach worked well when applications were relatively small, but as they got bigger and more complex, one machine, no matter how many smaller machines it was sliced into, was no longer sufficient.
Cloud applications that run at scale actually required the resources of more than one machine. The single container approach lets them use whatever resources they require, but while Mesos has been in production across a number of companies including Twitter, Airbnb, eBay and Netflix, the actual implementation remained highly complex and required skilled engineers to implement.
Mesosphere co-founder, Florian Liebert, say they saw an opportunity to simplify this and started Mesosphere. Among the first products it developed is a tool called Elastic Mesos, which lets system administrators create a fully running Mesos cluster in the Amazon cloud in just three steps, simplifying what had been a highly complex process.
But Trifiro says they won’t stop there. “We are bringing that level of simplicity and management to any target platform, from on-premises/private Ubuntu, Redhat, Debian, etc. to private clouds like OpenStack to public clouds like Amazon Web Services, Google Compute Engine and Digital Ocean,” he said.
What’s more, regardless of the underlying platform, it’s fault tolerant because if one machine inside the cluster fails, so long as there are available resources, Mesosphere’s product will simply transfer it to another machine without intervention from any human personnel.
The underlying administration tools, let you add different elements such as a web server, a web cache and a Hadoop cluster. In a traditional datacenter, these tools might be spread out across multiple servers in a highly inefficient manner that wasted much of the server capacity (as illustrated in the picture above).
Mesosphere fills up the space on one server before it starts adding applications to additional server space. If a job is running that requires a certain amount of server resources, it will fill the available resource capacity on one server, rather than simply starting on the next available one.
Mesos was originally developed as a Ph.D thesis by Benjamin Hindman, et. al., at University of California at Berkley. Liebert was working at Twitter when he discovered this research and brought Hindman on board to help solve Twitter’s infamous ‘Fail Whale’ problem where when the servers were pushed beyond capacity, Twitter simply stopped working and displayed the Fail Whale graphic. Twitter open sourced much of the code, which became the Apache Mesos project.
Liebert says his company’s product works for large and small companies alike because it simplifies these highly complex activities and that allows every datacenter, regardless of size, to use its personnel and computing resources much more efficiently.
IMAGE BY Mesosphere
Hugh Howey is a best-selling Sci-Fi author with a long and interesting pedigree. He’s been a yacht captain, a computer guy and, most recently, a bona fide publishing sensation. His book, the Wool Omnibus, started as a novella on the Amazon Kindle Store and suddenly blossomed into a massive, multi-volume opus that is a #1 Bestseller on Amazon and the winner of Kindle Book Review’s Best Indie Book of 2012 Award. It’s been optioned by Ridley Scott and recently appeared in hardcover under the Random House imprint in the U.K.
Plus, he’s a pretty cool guy.
As part of the the Mytro Project on self-publishing for the entrepreneur, I thought I’d ask him a few questions about his books, his writing, and the business of doing it yourself. He was kind enough to oblige.
TC: So the story for you is that things were quiet for you for a long time with your writing and suddenly things ballooned? What happened? Where are you now in terms of sales?
Howey: My writing career took off with the publication of a short story, Wool. But I was happy with my career up to that point. I had been writing and self-publishing for three years. My first six novels had sold around five thousand copies between them, which was far more than I ever thought I would sell. I was getting $100 – $150 in the mail every month, and the amount was creeping up. But then Wool came out, and the sales shot through the roof. 1,000 copies in October. 3,000 in November. 10,000 in December. I wrote four more stories, which turned the short piece into a full novel, and the collected work went to the top of the Amazon charts.
Within months of publishing Wool, I was flooded with emails from agents and people in Hollywood. I had to quit my day job just to handle all the media requests and fan emails. It was insane. I had previously dreamed of being able to work at the bookstore I was helping manage no matter how popular my books became, but that just proved impossible. For the past two years, I’ve been on the road constantly. Wool has been picked up in over 30 countries, and I’ve sold over two million books worldwide. Not what you expect to happen as you’re working in a bookstore and writing stories in your spare time.
TC: Who are you? What inspired you to write Wool?
Howey: I’m a bit of a vagabond. I dropped out of college, where I was studying physics and English, and I sailed off to the islands for a year. I went through a couple hurricanes and had to take on odd jobs to effect repairs to my sailboat. This led to a career as a yacht captain. I did that for the better part of a decade, and then I met my wife and started spending more and more time on dry land. I’d always wanted to be a writer, but I couldn’t get past the first few chapters of any book I started. It wasn’t until I began reviewing books for a crime fiction website that I learned the skill of writing every single day on a deadline. This lesson — plus traveling to book conventions — motivated me to try my hand at a novel, just to be able to say I’d done it.
Wool was my 7th or 8th published work. It’s an idea I’d come up with year earlier, about what it does to us to see nothing but bad news on the TV and in the papers all the time. We live in a Plato’s Cave of sorts, and the shadows on the walls are the worst of what’s behind us. I wanted to write a story about a people terrified of the outside world, where the heroes are the ones brave enough to go out and see for themselves and fight to make the world a better place.
TC: What kind of marketing did you do during those first few weeks and months?
Howey: I didn’t do any marketing for Wool until after it took off. I mean, I didn’t even have a link to the story on my website. I didn’t Tweet about it or Facebook about it. I think I published sample chapters early on, while it was still in rough draft. But nobody was reading my website then (or now, really). I did some stuff for my first novels. I did signings around town, spoke to some classrooms about writing, and I kept up a blog about the writing process. But the best promotion was just to write the next work. And the success came from word of mouth.
TC: What are some current best practices that you’re using to sell books?
Howey: I’m not great at selling books, to be honest. I don’t like asking strangers to check out my works. I find it embarrassing, and I’m just not good at it. My approach is to write stories that I find engrossing and then get them out there. And do it again. The way I use social media is to make myself available to my existing readers, not to win over new ones. I cherish every single reader, and I think that shows. If they enjoy my works, they are the best people to go out and spread the word.
TC: Why self-publish?
Howey: Man, we probably don’t have enough space here. Because I can write whatever I want. I’m working on a children’s picture book right now. I’ve written horror, YA, sci-fi, dystopia, general fiction, literary fiction, fan fiction, you name it. I can publish as often as I want. I don’t have deadlines. I make 70% on my e-books and $4 on my paperbacks (nearly twice what most Big 5 authors make on their hard backs). I can price my works however I want or give them away. I get to publish without DRM, which is a very important stance for me. I can even celebrate people pirating my work and only paying for it if they want. It’s hard to do any of this with a major publisher.
TC: Is traditional publishing dead, dying, or doing just fine?
Howey: It’s doing just fine. Publishers are seeing great profit margins. But that’s because they aren’t paying their authors a fair rate on e-book sales. This could backfire on them in the future. My guess is that we’ll see major publishers move to 50% of net on e-book royalties in order to keep their authors from bolting to self-publishing.
TC: What’s next? Now that you’re well known, how do you keep going?
Howey: I plan to continue publishing at least two works a year, but I want to do other things as well. I’m going to get into publishing in a different way soon. And I’m exploring opening up an independent bookstore.
TC: Very cool. What’s that about?
Howey: It’s a bricks and mortar store. I’m looking at spaces with a real estate agent now.
TC: Is this a full-time business for you now?
Howey: Oh, yeah. It’s all I do.
TC: How did you make it one?
Howey: My goal when I first started out was just to write a single novel. It has been a dream of mine since I was 12. So that was as far ahead as I was looking. But once I knew I could do this, I was hooked. And that’s when I decided I’d make a real go of becoming a full-time writer. My plan was to write for ten years before I judged my sales and earnings. I thought I could publish two works a year for a decade, and then I’d have a library of twenty works to promote. I didn’t waste my time trying to sell that first novel; I just kept writing. And I didn’t stick to one genre; I wrote a wide variety of stories in order to gauge my strengths and interests.
Being patient and having a long view was crucial, I think. I didn’t get discouraged, because I had no expectations. It isn’t like my books go stale. They’re all e-books and print-on-demand paperbacks. They are brand new and always in print, just waiting to be discovered. I firmly believe that if a well-read author commits to honing their craft and writing two novels a year for ten years, they will be able to make a career out of writing. The beauty of self-publishing is that you can give yourself that ten-year chance. You don’t have to rely on being discovered by an agent. You don’t have to waste your time querying and spending the two or three years it can take to get a single book published. And you aren’t limited to the narrow window in which your book will be displayed on a store shelf. You can publish now and publish forever. That’s a huge benefit, one that I recognized very early on.
My one other piece of advice is that you should publish your works as if millions of people will read them. Invest in quality cover art that looks great both in print and on a small online thumbnail. 90% of the bad covers out there are due to horrible font selection. Don’t get fancy; use something big, bold, and blocky. And get help with the editing, even if that means exchanging services with other writers. Don’t be in a rush to publish. Make your work shine.
While I was studying photography in college, Flickr was the best place to store, organize and share photos. Almost everyone with a DSLR used it, poring over photosets and meticulously crafted albums.
As smartphones grew in popularity, casual and professional photographers alike adopted mobile-centric apps such as Instagram. Flickr was slow to recognize this trend, however, and its relevancy slowly faded as the volume of photos captured, edited and shared from mobile devices grew.
I’ve always wanted a superlative service that offers the best of both. A place where I can store and share all of my favorite photos, regardless of whether I’ve shot them on a smartphone, compact system camera or full-frame DSLR.
Instagram’s success stems from its simplicity, but the platform’s limited presence on the Web makes it difficult to share photos from a traditional camera. Other apps and services offer workarounds, but it’s less than ideal.
I had hoped Google+, with its excellent Auto-Backup service on mobile and extensive photo-storage options on the Web, would become the Flickr and Instagram hybrid I was looking for. In some respects Google has succeeded on that front, although its aspirations to be a broader social network arguably dilute the experience on mobile. For instance, it’s almost impossible to view just photos in a single feed at the moment, similar to Instagram.
Under Yahoo chief executive Marissa Mayer’s stewardship, Flickr has been making a comeback. It has been a glacial rebirth, but inch-by-inch the renowned photo-storage service has been rethought and modernized.
Last week, the company released new versions of its Android and iOS apps. Both were given a radical redesign, combining the user experience of Instagram with the endless supply of beautiful photos already stored on the Web. Yahoo is one of the first companies to successfully bridge those two worlds and create a single, unified photo-sharing and storage service. A truly platform-agnostic service where everyone’s favorite smartphone and DSLR photos can coexist.
When you first open the Flickr app, you’ll be greeted with a vertical feed for recently uploaded photos. It looks almost identical to Instagram, with square-crop images and prominent icons for resharing, comment and favoriting. Everything is fast, clearly labeled and simple to use.
I suspect many will criticise Yahoo for “copying” Instagram, but personally I don’t have any complaints. The latter cracked the ideal UI for a mobile photo-sharing app, so why shouldn’t Yahoo follow its successful blueprint?
Moreover, in some ways Flickr actually improves upon the Instagram formula. Although the feed shows each photo as a square-crop, a single tap reveals the original image and pixel dimensions. The transition is seamless so you can quickly bounce between the two as you hurtle down the feed.
Flickr also offers a novel information pane for each photo. In the tapped view – where the original image dimensions are shown – it can be activated by selecting the “i” button in the bottom right-hand corner. Where possible, an illustration of the device is displayed alongside various exposure settings, including aperture, shutter speed, ISO and white balance.
It’s an area that Instagram has never delved into, due to the fairly restrictive manual controls available to iOS and Android devices. Inside Flickr, this feature is an important tool to help users differentiate between smartphone shots and those taken with a more serious, standalone camera. That’s not to say one group of photos is more important than the other, but when you pull them together into a single feed it’s just nice to know when curiosity grabs hold.
Unlike Instagram, Flickr supports albums too. The feature is a staple part of its web-based service, but it’s now tightly woven into the mobile experience as well. You can easily organize photos and group them together, or view other people’s collections from within their profile page. It brings a much-needed sense of order and hierarchy to people’s collections.
When multiple images are uploaded and shared, Flickr instantly groups them together in your feed. They appear as a collage, although you can swipe through to see each of them in turn. Photo essays are an established part of photography and Flickr is one of the first mobile apps to appreciate and cater for the format.
I’ve already witnessed a few promising knock-on effects from the redesigned mobile apps. A revamped set up process gives you the option to follow users that you already know through Facebook and Twitter. In the past, I’ve only used the service to follow inspirational photographers, but this approach encourages a more personal network of friends, family and colleagues.
Since they arrived on the App Store and Google Play, I’ve connected with a bevy of people on Flickr that, until now, I had no idea were even using the platform. Likewise, I’ve picked up new followers; some of which I know from Facebook and others, presumably, have found me through their Twitter following list. It’s a simple but effective way for Yahoo to rebuild and reinvigorate the community on Flickr. With a flood of new people and photos to interact with, users are more likely to open the app on a regular basis and post new photos of their own.
Flickr isn’t in a position to dethrone Instagram any time soon. The Facebook-owned photo-sharing service is still incredibly popular and that’s part of its appeal – because so many people open the app on a daily basis, users know their photos will be seen and appreciated by the largest possible audience. Flickr just doesn’t hold that sort of clout just yet.
The editing tools could also be improved, especially in comparison to renowned photo-editing apps such as VSCO Cam and Snapseed. The real-time filters are a nice touch, but most of them are overblown and the modifiers – which you access by swiping vertically on each filter card –can be difficult to grasp.
Even so, Yahoo has created the foundations for a rich, unified photo-storage and sharing service. Flickr’s mobile apps are now completely different to its website, but that’s entirely the point. Both platforms are fundamentally different, but that doesn’t mean they can’t relate to the same users and content.
It’s been a long wait, but it seems Flickr is finally on the right track again.
Here is a small but important update to Google Analytics: Developers can now create a single reporting view that includes both web and app data. Google says this will help businesses that have multiple digital touchpoints for their users (web, mobile apps, other devices) to better understand them.
Until today, Analytics users had to choose between an app view or web view when they created views. Both options provided a slightly different experience.
Now, no matter how users collect their data (whether on the web or from a mobile app), all of the stats can appear in a single view, which should indeed give businesses an easier way to gain insights from their users’ behavior through Google Analytics. This also means that the current web “Visitor” and “Active User” app metrics are now combined in a single “User” metric.
Instead of talking about “Visits” — which really only makes sense on the web — Analytics now refers to “Sessions” across the service. According to Google, this will give you “a clear and consistent way to analyze and refer to all of your Google Analytics data.”
Users who want to keep their web and app metrics separate will have to filter them in their reporting views.
As part of this update, Google’s analytics.js library for web apps now also includes the ability to track the user’s screen name, app name, app version and exception tracking.
These new features will roll out to all Analytics accounts over the next few weeks.
View original post here: Google Analytics Now Lets You Track Web And App Data In A Single View